The movie really brought some things into clarity for me because the only two parts that I was confused about. The first part that I was confused about was how Candy was involved in Lenny and George’s dream. In the book, the dialogue and how that portrayed confused me and I didn’t really understand but in the film, the dialogue was a little simpler and the people there saying it makes it easier for me to visually portray it. Also, when Lenny killed Curly’s wife. In the book, I could barely visualize it because it happened so fast. In the film, there was a deep visual aspect that allowed me to connect back to the book and see it actually happen based on the book’s dialogue and word choice.
Through the film, overall, it captured the spirit of the book and the main themes. The strong bond between Lenny and George was portrayed beautifully because not only could the audience visually see the chemistry, there was also a good aspect of subtle humor between the two and family love. Through the film, it actually showed and got into more depth about their relationship. In the book, you just read about them always being together and looking out for one another but when Lenny was in Crook’s room, he defended Lenny with a fierceness in his eyes. Also when Lenny was getting beaten up by Curly, George really had this helpless look in his eyes of hate and the need to go and help his friend. Also, how the two moved brought to life their bond.
Sometimes in a film, the audience cannot understand the theme as well as they could if they read the book. In other films, it is the other way around. This film seemed to nicely balance the two. One could still go see the film but then want to read the book after. Some of the very physical scenes, in my opinion, were portrayed better in the film than the book and certainly the ending was more impactful in the book.
No comments:
Post a Comment